Differences in writing and speaking styles
Every academic field approaches the world differently because every field values different things. WAC scholar Michael Carter describes this phenomenon as the difference between knowledge and knowing. The same facts can be used in different areas, but the way each field works with and values these facts differs.
For example, compare a Biology class with a Women and Gender Studies class. In a lab report, the focus is on documenting an experiment that could be duplicated by other researchers. It's not important that you did it; what's important is what happened in the experiment. As a result, lab reports are often written in passive voice and in a fairly dry style. Since the goal is communicating data, rhetorical flourishes and active voice (which puts the emphasis on the person doing the procedure, not the procedure itself) isn't appropriate.
Contrast that with Women and Gender Studies, which is focused on interpersonal relationships and one's encounter with the world. In these classes, it's not uncommon to read writing that includes personal evidence and a less formal tone. Again, the difference reflects a different understanding of the world. While the actions being described are important, the person taking these actions—as well as his or her thoughts about the actions—are equally important.
How do you learn to master these different styles of writing, speaking, and thinking? Practice. How do you get practice? You take WI and SI classes.
