UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA
UNIT: School of Education
AT GREENSBORO
DEPT: Educational Leadership and Cultural
Foundations
COURSE SYLLABUS
1.
Course Prefix and Number:
ELC 691
2.
Course Title: Principles
of Administration
3.
Credits: 3.0
4.
Course Prerequisites/Corequisites:
None
5.
For Whom Planned:
Required course in the Masters of School Administration program.
6. Instructor Information: Dr. Carolyn Riehl, cjriehl@uncg.edu, 334-3492
7.
Course Purpose/Catalog
Description: Purpose and scope of administration, schools of thought in
administration, processes of administration, and functions of administration.
8.
Teachers Academy Conceptual
Framework Mission Statement: The mission of professional education
at UNCG is to prepare and support the professional development of caring,
collaborative, and competent educators who work in diverse settings. This
mission is carried out in an environment that nurtures the active engagement
of all participants, values individual as well as cultural diversity and recognizes
the importance of reflection and integration of theory and practice. UNCG's
professional education programs are guided by shared commitments to: (a) equity
and excellence in teaching, research, and service; (b) professional integrity
and ethical deliberation in dealing with students and colleagues (university-based,
school-based, and community-based); (c) the construction of a professional
knowledge base through collaboration and collegiality; and (d) the dissemination
of professional knowledge, skills and dispositions through the preparation
and continuing professional development of teachers, principals and other
school personnel.
9.
Course Goals and/or Objectives/Student
Learning Outcomes: Instructor's statement of learning
outcomes OR goals/objectives from state or national professional standards
(please identify the organization, e.g. DPI, CEC, etc.)
Schools are one of the most common
and enduring types of formal organization in American public life. To work effectively in and with schools,
especially in the role of administrator, it is important to be able to see
deeply into how and why schools are organized as they are and how they could
be different. Thus, in this course,
we will think carefully and critically about schools as organizations. We will use key analytical and theoretical
perspectives to address practical issues and problems in the organization
and administration of public schooling.
We will focus especially closely on the experiences that persons from
diverse backgrounds have in schools and how schools could be organized more
effectively for these persons.
The primary goal for this course is to help students become more interested
in and adept at observing, interpreting, and managing organizational and administrative
problems in schools, in order to help schools meet the needs of the students
who learn in them, the teachers who work in them, and the broader society
that relies on them. By developing
fuller understandings of present conditions in schools, and by imagining possible
futures for schools, students will be invited to create their own approach
to administrative practice.
10.
Teaching Strategies:
lecture, class discussion, group work, conferences, student presentations,
electronic chat room, etc.
11. Evaluation Methods and Guidelines for Assignments:
Course grades will be determined as follows: organizational analysis
of a school case -- 50%; diversity case analysis – 30%; class participation
-- 20%. Your course grade, and the overall success
of the course, will depend upon a high level of group and individual participation
in the following activities.
Readings
and Related Class Activities
A significant component of our work
together is our collective encounter with the assigned readings. The readings are an important class resource,
and they deserve your careful attention. Students should be prepared to read the journal articles and
book chapters prior to the sessions for which they are listed, to develop
questions and commentary on the readings, to reflect on experiences in their
own backgrounds which relate to the readings, and to be actively engaged in
class discussions and activities pertaining to the readings.
Part of your grade will be based on your class participation. For this I am looking for steady attendance,
evidence that you have indeed read the assignments, and your contributions
to class discussions and other activities.
School
Organizational Analysis
In this course, you will have the opportunity to explore organizational
dynamics in schools through the study of cases.
We will have multiple opportunities in class to read brief case studies
of schools, to analyze them, and to consider implications for administrative
practice.
Each student will also write an original, extended organizational analysis
of a school case. For this assignment,
you will choose a school with which you are familiar and present a thorough
description and analysis of how it works as an organization and how it could
be improved. Although you should
use true information from a real school, the case write-up should be anonymous,
so that the identities of the school and its personnel cannot be determined
by a typical reader.
The case description and analysis should include at least the
following components (total length should be about 20-30 pages):
§
A very general introductory
description of the school – type of school, location, brief history,
number of students and staff, other descriptive information
§
A general description of
the school’s performance and a general assessment of the school’s
strengths and weaknesses (or successes and problems), using ABC data, school
attendance and dropout figures, your own impressions of the school, parent
or student comments, and so on
§
A description and analysis
of the goals and purposes of the school
§
A description and analysis
of the structural dimensions of the school
§
A description and analysis
of the human resource dimensions of the school
§
A description and analysis
of the political dimensions of the school
§
A description and analysis
of the cultural dimensions of the school
§
A description and analysis
of the school’s relationships to its external environment(s)
§
A summary discussion of suggestions
for improving the school, including an action plan that might guide the work
of the school’s administrator
The
case will be written in stages. You
will write each section after the topic has been discussed in class, and you
will have the opportunity to receive feedback on your drafts from the instructor
and/or other students.
It is important for you to remember that you should provide
evidence and justification for all of the comments and analyses you include
in your case. Available data
and written records from your school, interviews with school personnel, and
observations you make can be used as sources of information. It would be helpful if you included various
formal documents in your report, for example summary tables of ABC test scores
for the school. (These documents
will not count towards the suggested page length of the report, however.)
Impressionistic opinions generally do not offer sufficient warrant
for the depth of analysis you will need to provide in your case.
This assignment is intended to articulate with assignments
in other courses in the MSA core sequence, to help you integrate what you
learn in separate courses. If
you are enrolled in Dr. Williamson’s course on the principalship, you
may use the school culture analysis which he assigns as part of your case
analysis (provided, of course, that you are writing about the same school). If you enroll in ELC 694 (Organization
and Governance of Public Education) next term with Dr. Riehl, you will be
able to combine this term’s organizational analysis with the governance/policy
analysis for that course, to produce a comprehensive school case analysis.
Each
component of the organizational analysis, and the overall assignment, will
be evaluated according to the following criteria:
Evaluative Criteria for School Organizational
Analysis
|
Criterion |
High
Quality Work |
Low
Quality Work |
|
Choice
of case |
There
is much evidence that you have thought carefully about how this school
could help you examine and understand organizational dynamics |
It
appears that you are writing about this school merely because you have
some familiarity with it |
|
Range
and depth of observations made in description and analysis |
In
each section of the report, you have covered all of the most significant
aspects of the topic and have made many relevant and insightful observations
about the school |
You
have provided just one or two examples for each section of the case
analysis
|
|
Reliance
upon strong evidence and logical justification |
You
have used empirical data (reports, observations, interviews, etc.) as
a firm basis for your comments and analysis, and have built an argument
about the school using clear and reasonable logic. |
You
have provided scant evidence to justify your comments and analysis,
and have written only a sketchy, impressionistic account of the school. |
|
Connection
of your own reflections on the school with the concepts and issues talked
about in class |
You
use terms, concepts, and frameworks gleaned from class readings and
discussions, in ways that show you have thought deeply about them. There is evidence of an ongoing interaction
or conversation in your own mind between what you are doing in class
and what you are observing in your school. |
Your
use of terms, concepts, and frameworks from class is limited, perfunctory,
and not very thoughtful. |
|
Creativity
and integrity of the final analysis and suggestions for change
|
You
have gone beyond merely reporting on what you see and what you read;
you have truly integrated the two and added your own creative and thoughtful insights to your analysis |
Your
analysis and suggestions for change are limited in scope and not very
inventive or exciting. |
|
Quality
of the writing |
You
have made proper use of spelling and grammar, and proper use of the
APA format for reference citations.
Your case study is clearly organized and persuasive; you have
a logical flow of sentences and paragraphs, and evidence of attention
to the musicality of the language |
Your
paper has spelling or grammar errors, shows a lack of organization,
doesn’t flow smoothly from one idea or section to the next. You have not cited your references properly. |
|
Overall
quality of the case study
|
Your
case study gives a general impression that you know what you’re
talking about and have expressed it well |
Your
paper just doesn’t seem to shine. |
University of North Carolina at
Greensboro
College of Education
ELC 691: Principles of Administration
Professor Carolyn Riehl
Evaluation Form for School Organizational
Analysis
Student: _______________________________________
|
Criteria |
Poor |
|
Avg. |
|
Very Good |
|
Choice
of a rich and appropriate case
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Range
and depth of observations made in description and analysis
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4
|
5 |
|
Reliance
upon strong evidence and logical justification |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4
|
5 |
|
Connection
of your own reflections on the school with the concepts and issues talked
about in class
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Creativity
and integrity of the final analysis and suggestions for change
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4
|
5
|
|
Quality
of the writing
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Overall
grade for the case study |
F |
D
|
C |
B |
A |
Comments:
Diversity
Case Analysis
Each student will also prepare a shorter analysis (about 8-10 pages)
of their school that specifically addresses the issue of diversity. This analysis will focus on the experiences of a particular
individual or group within the school, how the school organization contributes
to those experiences, and how the organizational dynamics could be altered
so that the educational experiences of the individual or group might be improved.
For this assignment, you will choose a particular person or group to
study, preferably one who is different in important ways from you. (Ideally, the person or group will be
situated in the same school you used for your organizational case analysis.)
You will describe that person/group’s experiences in school,
drawing primarily on their own perspective but adding some of your own.
To do this, you will need to talk with them, their teachers, their
parents, and any others who can help you gain an “insider” perspective
on their experiences. It might
also be helpful for you to hang out with them for a while, to observe their
life in school and try to see it from their vantage point. You will also report on your own perspective,
based on your observations and impressions, and on any “objective”
information you may have such as test scores or grades.
In this section, you may include discussion of topics such as:
·
Who is this person (or group)?
What are they like? How
do they see themselves?
·
How does the school see this
student/group, and their particular qualities?
·
How is the student’s
home culture related to the school?
·
What learning resources does
the student have access to – special teachers, special curriculum, etc.?
What learning tasks does the student get to do?
·
How well is this student
doing in school? How aware is
the school of the student’s progress? How does the school assess this student’s
performance?
·
What is the quality of the
student’s relationships and experiences with teachers, other students
like and unlike herself, other school staff, etc.?
·
Does the student have friends?
·
Does the student participate
in extra-curricular activities?
·
How does the student experience
the authority system of the school; is the student frequently punished, etc.?
·
How does the student “fit
in” to the school, and why?
Then, with this information in mind, you will do an organizational
analysis of the school. How do
the school’s purposes and goals, structural features, human resource
dimension, political dynamics, and culture influence what happens to this
student? You will conclude with
suggestions for change. How could
the school organization be altered to help provide a more effective education
for the student?
It is very important that you write this diversity case analysis
anonymously, protecting the identity of the individual and/or group of students
you discuss.
This assignment will be graded according to criteria similar
to the larger case analysis, using the following rating sheet.
University of North Carolina at
Greensboro
College of Education
ELC 691: Principles of Administration
Professor Carolyn Riehl
Evaluation Form for Diversity Case
Analysis
Student:_______________________________________
|
Criteria |
Poor |
|
Avg. |
|
Very Good |
|
Choice
of an appropriate and significant group/person to study |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Range
and depth of observations about the student/group and their experiences
in the school |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4
|
5 |
|
Range
and depth of observations about the organizational dynamics of the school
and how they affect the student/group |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4
|
5 |
|
Reliance
upon strong evidence and logical justification |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4
|
5 |
|
Connection
of your own reflections on the school with the concepts and issues talked
about in class |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Creativity
and integrity of the final analysis and suggestions for change |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4
|
5
|
|
Quality
of the writing
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Overall
grade for the diversity case study |
F |
D
|
C |
B |
A |
Comments:
12.
Required Text(s)/Readings/References: Use full citations
There is a coursepack of readings, available at Copy Postal
One (801 W. Lee Street, in the mini-mall just east of Tate Street). Their telephone number is 273-0644.
There are also two required books, available at the University Bookstore
or from an online vendor:
Darling-Hammond, Linda. (1995). The
right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Earle, Jason, and Kruse, Sharon.
(1999). Organizational literacy for educators. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,
Publishers.
13.
Topical Outline:
This might also be your calendar. The
course outline should contain sufficient detail to permit assessment of agreement
between actual content and stated objectives and catalog description.
Weekly Schedule
Week 1 (August 22):
Course Introduction and Overview
Key Questions:
§
What are some important questions regarding
how schools are organized and administered and how they could be changed?
§
When you look at a school, what do you “see”?
§
How does skill in organizational analysis
fit into the North Carolina school administrator competencies?
Recommended
Readings:
Schlechty, Phillip
C., & Joslin, Anne Walker. (1984).
Images of schools. Teachers
College Record, 86(1),
156-170.
Morgan, Gareth.
(1997). Images of organization (2nd ed.). Thousand
Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications.
Grant, David,
& Oswick, Cliff. (Eds.) (1996). Metaphor and organizations.
Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage Publications.
Week 2 (August 29):
The School's Foundation: Purpose and Task
Key Questions:
What starting point would you use for designing and administering an
exemplary school? Why?
Can you articulate your foundational ideas and ideals to others?