|
ENG
608: Chaucer: Canterbury Tales and Critical Theory Fall
2002 Mr.
Stallcup Course
Information and Expectations |
|
|
Instructor |
Stephen Stallcup 127 McIver Hall
(336) 334-4694 |
|
Time
and Place |
Th 6:30-9:15 |
|
Description
and Learning Goals |
This
course provides an in-depth study of Geoffrey Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales through the lens of modern literary critical
theory. By applying a number of current theoretical practices (New
Historicist, gender studies, psychoanalytic, post-colonial, etc.) to
Chaucer’s multi-faceted story collection, we will interrogate not only the
medieval text, but also some of the critical paradigms that inform literary
study today. This course is designed for medievalists and non-medievalists
alike and assumes only a willingness to be immersed in fourteenth-century
England for the semester. We will read the Tales in the original Middle English at the rate of one per week.
By the end of this course, participants will be able to: (1) Read texts
written in Middle English; (2) Relate basic facts of Chaucer’s life and
literary career and major cultural and historical events of
fourteenth-century England; (3) Describe several major literary critical
theories and practices; (4) Identify the theoretical position(s) of a
scholarly piece of literary criticism; (5) Apply one or more
critical/theoretical approach to a Chaucerian text; (6) Evaluate the efficacy
of contemporary theory as a tool for analyzing medieval literature. |
|
Evaluation |
one class presentation and handout (10%) two group presentations (two @ 30% each = 60%) |
|
Attendance |
Regular and prompt attendance is required of all
students. Students missing more than THREE classes (20% of total) for
whatever reason will be dropped from the course. |
|
Participation |
Seminar participants should come having read the
assigned primary and secondary readings and be prepared to discuss them.
Group projects cannot be “made up”; participants are expected to meet with
their groups and contribute fully to the projects. |
|
Group
projects |
Twice during the semester, participants will divide
into groups of three. Each group will apply an assigned critical perspective
to a set Canterbury tale. Each group will produce a “position paper” and post
it on the course website. Each group
will then critique the position papers of the other groups and post those
critiques. On the class day devoted to the group projects, each group will
make a formal presentation defending and refining its own position in light
of the critiques. |
|
Article
presentation |
Each participant will give a brief (no more than
ten-minute) presentation on one of the assigned secondary readings. The
presentation should include a summary of the reading’s argument (thesis);
outline of argumentation; and critique (positive or negative). The presenter
should compile a one-page handout to accompany the presentation. |
|
On-line
discussion |
Participants are expected to contribute regular
comments to the online Blackboard discussion forum. |
|
Academic
integrity |
UNCG’s policies on academic integrity (in the 2002/2003
Student Calendar/Handbook pp. 213-222) will be enforced rigorously. Students
should especially familiarize themselves with UNCG’s definitions of cheating
and plagiarism as well as the associated penalties for violations. |
|
Disability
policy |
In order to receive special accommodation because of a
legitimate physical or learning disability, affected students must register
with the Office of Disability Services (334-5540) as soon as possible. The
instructor will be happy to work out any necessary arrangements provided he
is notified in a timely manner. |
|
Required
materials |
*These are the only
acceptable editions for use in this class. |
.
Syllabus for ENG 608
Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales and Critical Theory
(B) Blackboard website (E) Jackson Library electronic reserve
|
Date |
Primary reading |
Secondary Reading |
|
R 8/22 |
Introduction, etc. |
|
|
R 8/29 |
Chaucer; the challenge of Middle English; the challenge of Critical Theory |
“Introduction,” Riverside Chaucer, pp. xv-xlvii. Beidler, pp. 3-16; 28-41; Barthes, “The Death of the Author” (B); Dane, “Unbooking Chaucer” (handout) |
|
R 9/5 |
Historicisms (old and new) |
Beidler, pp. 115-126; Mann, pp. 37-54 (E); Strohm, pp. 65-79 |
|
R 9/12 |
Ways of reading Chaucer; Formalism |
Beidler, pp. 89-114; Kittredge, “The Marriage Group” (B); Lumiansky, pp. 117-129 (E) |
|
R 9/19 |
Feminist criticism |
Beidler, pp. 255-261; Hansen, pp. 121-146 (E) |
|
R 9/26 |
Marxist criticism |
Beidler, pp. 155-166; Aers, “Chaucer: Love, Sex and Marriage” (B) |
|
R 10/3 |
Deconstruction The Franklin’s Tale |
Beidler, pp. 221-229; Wheeler (E) |
|
R 10/10 |
Group Project 1: Shipman’s Tale |
|
|
R 10/17 |
Psychoanalysis |
Beidler, pp. 189-198; Leicester, pp. 473-99 (E); Strohm, pp. 201-14 |
|
R 10/24 |
Space |
Strohm, pp. 3-19; Schildgen, pp. 48-68 (E) |
|
R 10/31 |
Masculinities TBA |
TBA |
|
R 11/7 |
Post-colonialism The Prioress’s Tale |
Cohen, “Introduction: Midcolonial” (E); Tomasch, “Postcolonial Chaucer and the Virtual Jew” (E) |
|
R 11/14 |
Violence |
Das and Kleinman, “Introduction” (E); |
|
R 11/21 |
Group Project 2: |
|
|
R 11/29 |
Thanksgiving Holiday: No class |
|
|
R 12/5 |
TBA |
TBA |
|
M 12/9 |
Paper due for
December graduates |
|
|
W 12/18 |
Final paper due for
everyone else |
|
|
|
|
|
.