A research program is a series of studies conducted over a number of years to examine a significant topic in great depth. Scholars develop research programs to study a phenomenon or construct in detail from many different perspectives. I have conducted research associated with three such research programs: Teachers' Values and Beliefs, Student Engagement, and Cognitive Conceptions. For each I have examined several variables associated with the phenomenon in an effort to create a more complete understanding each variables' role in enhancing or constraining student learning.
I have written a tutorial article for the Journal of Teaching in Physical Education (1999, Vol. 18,129-140) that discusses the development of research programs in more detail.
Each of these programs has consumed a decade of my professional career and has led to a number of publications and presentations on these topics. Although a scholar never really completes a research program, occasionally there are factors that lead one to place less emphasis on one program as data and professional interests evolve into a new set of issues, initiating the next research program. Each new program is connected to the previous program and serves as a conceptual foundation influencing each new step. Currently, I am entering a very exciting time in my career as my interests in teachers' beliefs and student engagement is leading me to initiate a research program examining student learning of cognitive concepts in physical education described as Conceptual Change.
In each section, I provide a brief description of each of these research programs. You will find
Although the research program examining Conceptual Change is in its initial stages, it is influenced by my previous research at the University of Wisconsin investigating students' knowledge conceptions. If you are a considering graduate work (masters or doctoral) at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro and are interested in studying with me as your major advisor, you should read this section with care to determine if you are interested in studying curriculum theory and development in physical education with a focus on conceptual change.
I have been fortunate to work with a number of outstanding colleagues and graduate students in each of these programs. Please note their names on the publication lists. Their intelligence, creativity, humor, and persistence have been instrumental in the development of these programs and the publication of our research.
I became interested in Teachers’ Beliefs and Values as a graduate student at the University of Georgia when my advisor, Dr. Ann E. Jewett, structured in-depth graduate student seminars on the topic of Value Orientations. Ann led these detailed philosophical discussions with her graduate students to examine each orientation and its potential influence on curriculum theory and development. These discussions supported by extensive literature critiques prepared me to begin my research efforts to measure Teachers’ Value Beliefs and Value Orientations as an assistant professor at the University of Wisconsin. The development of the Value Orientation Inventory (VOI) and subsequent revisions (VOI-2) with Dr. Ang Chen provided the framework for studies examining experienced teachers’ value orientations. Currently, a shorten version of the (VOI-SF) has been validated by Dr. Chen and is available by contacting him.
Over the years other scholars have used the Value Orientation Inventory in a variety of research. It has been translated into 6 languages (Chinese, French, Hebrew, Dutch, Spanish, and German) using a rigorous translation protocol first employed by Dr. Dominque Banville. It has also been revised slightly to be applicable for use by researchers in other subject areas, although to my knowledge, research from this version has yet to be published. Copies of the VOI-2, scoring guide, and list of publications examining value orientations using the VOI inventories are available for download from this website.
A Note of Caution When Using the VOI
It is important to remember when considering the use of the VOI-2 that it was validated with an experienced population of physical educators (average teaching experience = 17 years). This population appears to have fairly stable value orientations, perhaps due to the fact that they have developed and tested their educational belief systems systematically over time. Conversely, scholars who wish to use the VOI-2 to examine the beliefs of other populations, such as pre-service and novice physical education teachers, should first validate the VOI-2 with these populations and report this validation process with the findings.
In this section I outline some of our most relevant findings using the VOI, VOI-2, and VOI-SF, provide a list of our publications associated with the construct of teachers’ values and beliefs, and include a copy of the VOI-2 and scoring guide for interested scholars and students.
Ennis, C.D., & Hooper, L.M. (1988). Development of an instrument for assessing educational value orientations. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20, 277-280.
Ennis, C.D., Mueller, L.K., & Hooper, L.M. (1990). The influence of teacher value orientations on curriculum planning within the parameters of a theoretical framework. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 61, 360-368.
Jewett, A.E., & Ennis, C.D. (1990). Ecological integration as a value orientation for curricular decision making. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 5, 120-131.
Ennis, C.D. (1990). Analyzing curriculum as participant perspectives. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 9, 79-94.
Ennis, C.D., & Zhu, W. (1991). Value orientations: A description of teachers’ goals for student learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62, 33-40.
Ennis, C.D. (1992). Curriculum theory as practiced: Case studies of operationalized value orientations. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 11(4), 358-375.
Ennis, C.D. (1992). Reconceptualizing learning as a dynamical system. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 7, 115-130.
Ennis, C.D. (1992). The influence of value orientations in curricular decision making. Quest, 44(3), 317-329.
Ennis, C.D., Chen, A., & Ross, J. (1992). Educational value orientations as a theoretical framework for experienced urban teachers’ curricular decision making. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 25, 156-163.
Ennis, C.D., Ross, J., & Chen, A. (1992). The role of value orientations in curricular decision making: A rationale for teachers’ goals and expectations. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63, 38-47.
Ennis, C.D., & Chen, A. (1993). Domain specifications and content representativeness of the revised Value Orientation Inventory (VOI-2). Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64(1), 436-446.
Ennis, C.D. (1994). Knowledge and beliefs underlying curricular expertise. Quest, 46, 165-175.
Ennis, C.D. (1994). Urban secondary teachers’ value orientations: Delineating curricular goals for social responsibility. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 13, 163-179.
Ennis, C.D. (1994). Urban secondary teachers’ value orientations: Social goals for teaching. Teaching & Teacher Education, 10(1), 109-120.
Ennis, C.D. & Chen, A. (1995).Teachers’ value orientations in urban and rural school settings. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 66(1), 41-50.
Ennis, C.D. (1996). A model describing the influence of values and context on student learning. In S. Silverman & C.D. Ennis, (Eds.), Student learning in physical education: Applying research to enhance instruction (pp. 127-148).Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Ennis, C.D., Cothran, D.J., & Loftus, S.J. (1997). The influence of teachers’ educational beliefs on their knowledge organization. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30, 73-86.
Chen, A., Liu, Z., & Ennis, C.D. (1997). Universality and uniqueness of teacher educational value orientations: A cross-cultural comparison between USA and China (VOI-SF). Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30(3), 135-143.
Zhu, W., Ennis, C.D., & Chen, A. (1998). Modeling experts’ judgment in test development. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 2, 21-40.
Extensive research in public schools examining teachers’ values and beliefs raised interesting questions about the impact of educational situations or contexts on the extent to which teachers could plan, teach, and assess in a manner consistent with their beliefs. We became aware of teachers who had very clear value orientation profiles, who could articulate and elaborate their value perspectives cogently, but when observed, were not teaching in a manner consistent with their value perspectives. Because one of our earlier findings indicated that many teachers taught consistently with their perspectives, this line of research began with the examination of conditions under which teacher did not or could not teach in a manner that was consistent with their value orientation profiles.
In the course of this research program, a number of variables were examined such as organizational and management skills, ability to teach effectively, and administrative support, including instructional time, facilities and equipment. However, in the urban schools in which we routinely conduct our research, the most salient factor that constrained teacher ability to teach their values was their (a) knowledge content, (b) knowledge of teaching methods consistent with their value profile, and (c) ability to engage students effectively in the content.
This research program included qualitative research studies examining factors in the teaching environment including curricular and teaching practices that disrupted the instructional process. The research relied on in-depth observations of physical education lessons and extensive interviews with students, teachers and administrators. Although we agreed with physical educators that disruptive students made it very difficult to teach content, we looked more deeply at the pedagogical practices that appeared to trigger student disruptions.
As our research continued, we developed a better understanding of content and pedagogical presentations that could engage even the “most disruptive” students. We developed these perspectives into a coherent curriculum model based directly on the Sport Education model (Siedentop, 1995). The new “Sport for Peace” curriculum was examined extensively in middle and high schools. This curriculum approach enhanced the interest that students had in the content, increased the mutual respect between teachers and students, assisted students to be more personally and socially responsible, helped them to care for others and to use conflict negotiation skills to resolve social issues during class time. In fact, students explained this approach as helping the physical education class feel like a “family.” This sense of family translated into a higher level of student engagement with a resulting increase in student knowledge and skill.
Ennis, C.D. (1994). Urban secondary teachers' value orientations: Delineating curricular goals for social responsibility. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 13, 163-179.
Ennis, C.D. (1994). Urban secondary teachers' value orientations: Social goals for teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(1), 109-120.
Ennis, C.D. (1995). Teachers' responses to noncompliant students: The realities and consequences of a negotiated curriculum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 445-460.
Ennis, C. D. (1996). Students’ experiences in sport-based physical education: [More than] Apologies are necessary. Quest, 48, 454-457.
Ennis, C.D. (1996). When avoiding confrontation leads to avoiding content: Disruptive students' impact on curriculum. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 11, 145-162.
Chen, A., & Ennis, C.D. (1996). Teaching value-laden curricula in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 15, 338-354.
Cothran, D.J., & Ennis, C.D. (1997). Students and teachers’ perceptions of conflict and power. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 541-553.
Ennis, C.D., Cothran, D.J., Stockin, K.D., Owens, L.M., Loftus, S.J., Swanson, L., & Hopsicker, P. (1997). Implementing curriculum within a context of fear and disengagement. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17, 58-72.
Ennis, C.D. (1998). The context of culturally unresponsive curriculum: Constructing ethnicity and gender within a contested terrain. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 749-760.
Cothran, D.J., & Ennis, C.D. (1998). Curricula of mutual worth: Comparisons of students' and teachers' curricular goals. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17, 307-326.
Cothran, D.J., & Ennis, C.D. (1999). Alone in a crowd: Meeting students’ needs for relevance and connection in urban high school physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 18, 234-247.
Ennis, C.D. (1999). The theoretical framework: The central piece in the research plan. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 18,129-140.
Ennis, C.D. (1999). Creating a culturally relevant curriculum for disengaged girls. Sport, Education, and Society, 4, 31-49.
Ennis, C.D. (1999). Communicating the value of active, healthy lifestyles to urban students. Quest, 51, 164-169.
Ennis, C.D., Solmon, M.A., Satina, B. Loftus, S.J., Mensch, J., & McCauley, M.T. (1999) Creating a sense of family in urban schools using the “Sport for Peace” Curriculum. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70, 273-285.
Cothran, D.J., & Ennis, C.D. (2000). Building bridges to student engagement: Communicating respect and care for students in urban high schools. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 23, 106-117.
Ennis, C.D. (2000). Canaries in the coal mine: Responding to disengaged students using theme-based curricula. Quest, 52, 119-130.
Cothran, D.J., & Ennis, C.D. (2001). "Nobody said nothing about learning stuff": Students, teachers, and curricular change. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36, 1-5.
Ennis, C. D., & McCauley, M.T. (2002). Creating urban classroom communities worthy of trust. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34, 149-172.
Azzarito, L., & Ennis, C.D. (2003). A sense of connection: Toward social constructivist physical education. Sport, Education, and Society.
Chen, A., & Ennis, C.D. (2004). The role of achievement based interest in curricular effectiveness. Journal of Educational Research, 97, 329-338.
Owens, L. & Ennis, C.D. (2005). The ethic of care in teaching: An overview of supportive literature. Quest, 57, 392-425. This article won the American Educational Research Association, Research on Learning and Instruction in Physical Education, Exemplary Paper Award, 2005.
Ennis, C.D. (2006). Curriculum: Forming and reshaping the vision of physical education in a high need, low demand world of schools. Quest, 58, 41-59.
Chen, A., Martin, R., Sun, H., & Ennis, C. D. (2007). Is physical activity at risk in constructivist physical education? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport.78, 500-509.
In the early 1990’s I worked as a junior faculty member with my distinguished University of Wisconsin colleagues, Dr. Margaret J. Safrit and Dr. Fran Nagel, to examine teachers’ and students’ information retrieval and decision-making. We conducted a series of studies examining a computer-based program that students used to generate fitness prescriptions. Using a novice-expert comparison protocol, we analyzed novice subjects’ thought processes when analyzing computer case studies and prescribing fitness programs to address specific client needs. We then compared the novices’ solutions processes to those of experts.
In a related set of studies, I worked with Dr. Joanne Lazarus, also a colleague at the University of Wisconsin, to compare the solutions of field dependent and independent elementary students on ball retrieval tasks. By adjusting the demands of the tasks, we learned that we could encourage young students to think differently about movement problems and to adjust the strategies they used to solve the problems. I continued this research with field dependent and independent students examining difference in their approaches to a variety of physical education tasks within a movement education curriculum. Working with several other colleagues and graduate students, we designed a series of classroom strategies and tasks philosophically consistent with a movement education curricular perspective to address the needs of field dependent children learning within this complex curriculum.
In 2003, Dr. Ang Chen and I (Ennis, PI) received a 5 year NIH grant to design, implement, evaluate, and disseminate a new science-based curriculum. The purpose of the curriculum was to increase 3rd – 5th grade students’ knowledge and interest in fitness based physical education curriculum. Working with Elaine Lindsay, NASPE teacher of the year and Maryland AHPERD Executive Director, and a host of graduate students, we explored how students’ learned cognitive fitness concepts.
Defined within the parameters of the National Standards in Physical Education and Science Education, this research is based on the Framework Theory of Conceptual Change (Vosnaidou, 1994) and examines how students’ beliefs about knowledge influences their acquisition, organization, and utilization of knowledge. In the process we are investigating students’ naïve theories and how these evolve through a series of synthetic models to become more like the models used by their teachers’ and other science and fitness experts. Although student “errors” or “mistakes” have been described traditionally as misconceptions, we follow Vosnaidou’s and Alexander’s (2006) perspective that they are, instead, naïve theories that serve as scaffolds to build more complex and sophisticated conceptual understandings.
We hypothesize that in physical education students’ knowledge growth is facilitated by kinesthetic movement experiences increasing students’ depth of understanding. Following the NIH grant, my doctoral student, Marina Bonello, completed her dissertation study examining students’ development of the concept of intensity and its relationship to other FITT principles.
As we develop this program of research, I am interested in working with new colleagues and graduate students who share these interests. Information about graduate study in our laboratory and about becoming part of our research team is available under the heading “Prospective Graduate Students” and on the UNCG Exercise and Sport Sciences website.
(+ designates data-based research; h designates research or philosophical synthesis; * designates invited article):
+Safrit, M.J., Ennis, C.D., & Nagle, F.J. (1988). The use of problem solving skills in computer aided instruction: An evaluation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 4, 227-243.
+Ennis, C.D., & Chepyator_Thomson, J.R. (1990). Learning characteristics of field_dependent children within an analytical concept-based curriculum. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 10, 170-187.
+Ennis, C.D., & Hooper, L. M. (1990). An analysis of the Purpose Process Curriculum Framework as a theoretical framework for an instrument to examine teacher priorities for selecting curriculum content. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 61, 50-58.
+Ennis, C.D., & Lazarus, J.C. (1990). Cognitive style and gender differences in children's motor task performance. Early Child Development and Care, 64, 33-46.
+Ennis, C.D. (1991). Discrete thinking skills in two teachers' physical education classes. Elementary School Journal, 91, 473-487.
+Ennis, C.D. (1991). Instructional strategies to facilitate the learning of field-dependent children. Early Child Development and Care, 67, 95-109.
+Ennis, C.D., Chen, A., & Fernández-Balboa, J.M. (1991). Cognitive style differences within an analytical curriculum: Examples of success and nonsuccess. Early Child Development and Care, 74, 123-134.
+Ennis, C.D., Mueller, L.K., & Zhu, W. (1991). Description of knowledge structures within a concept-based curriculum framework. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62, 309-318.
+Ennis, C.D., & Safrit, M.J. (1991). The use of hierarchical problem solving subroutines in the solution of exercise science problems. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 241-254.
+Ennis, C.D., & Safrit, M.J. (1991). Utilizing a computer simulation to compare expert/ novice problem-solving subroutines. British Journal of Educational Technology, 22, 174-186.
In 2003, The NIH National Center for Research Resources funded a 5 yr. study to design, implement, and evaluate an elementary Science Based Physical Education (SBPE) curriculum for urban school children. The grant, totaling ~$1.5 million, has supported curriculum writing, extensive professional development for physical education teachers, the development of innovative instructional technology, and extensive data collection and analysis to examine the effectiveness of this program to enhance student learning in science and physical education. It was our goal/hypothesis that students would increase their cognitive understandings through movement and that physical education could be both physically active and contribute to the academic mission of the schools.
Research DesignThis research was conducted as a randomized clinical trial in which 3000 students in 3rd, 4th and 5th grade at 15 experimental schools participated in the new curriculum. Their performance on a variety of physically active tasks, knowledge tests, and interest questionnaires were compared with students in 15 comparison schools. Project team members gathered data from students at each school on variables such as science and physical education knowledge, interest in science and physical education, and perceptions of themselves as junior scientists. Forty-five teachers evaluated the ease of use of the curriculum and offered suggestions throughout the 5 year period to improve the quality and usefulness of the new curriculum and the 90 instructional lessons. The data were analyzed descriptively and using multivariate and other hierarchical linear modeling to examining the effectiveness of the curriculum in enhancing student learning.
SBPE Curriculum Materials and Staff DevelopmentSBPE Curriculum Products include three, 30 lesson units for 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade students (90 lessons total in health related science with natural connections to physical education. The units in the Be Active Pals Curriculum were “Dr. Love’s Healthy Heart,” “Mickey’s Mighty Muscles,” and “Flex Coolbody’s Fitness Club,” use the scientific process within a series of problem-solving lessons to guide students to construct their understanding of concepts and skills. Lessons include student workbooks that assist them to focus and monitor the active-learning process.
Teacher Staff Development - Teachers received extensive curriculum and instructional materials and extensive professional development. Additionally, as teachers implemented the units, they were able to request assistance from the program’s master teachers to model lessons and offer in-class suggestions to enhance teaching effectiveness. An interactive website was available to keep parents informed of the content and topics their students were studying and to offer informative tips regarding family health within this format. Data collection was centralized from this website offering each school the opportunity to monitor project findings.
Involving Families in Science and Physical Education - A Family Science Activity Night accompanied the units to invite families back to school for an evening. Third – fifth grade students lead their families through a series of nine physically active science experiments similar to those the children experienced in their physical education classes. Students assumed responsibility for the evening events, acting as the junior scientist in-charge of the Family Science Activity Night activities. Over 500 families participated in these events conducted over 4 years at the 15 experimental schools.
SBPE Partners - The grant was funded through an NIH, NCRR Science Education Partnership Award and involved several key partnerships that supported and facilitated our work. Our school district partner was the Prince George’s County Public Schools, Maryland. This is a large urban district bordering Washington, DC enrolling 136,000 students. Students are culturally diverse and reflect both lower and middle class backgrounds. Our project focused specifically on Title 1 schools, assisting lower performing students to engage and learn health related science in physical education.
The partnership with Kinesiology Scientists and Science Teachers provided expertise to ensure that the science and physical education content was accurate and taught appropriately within the physical education lessons. Likewise, kinesiology scientists and their graduate students visited the experimental elementary schools meeting students and providing them an opportunity to meet real scientists, enhancing the authenticity of the curriculum. The scientists, in turn, helped students to conceptualize the scientific process, examining the effects of physical activity on their bodies.
Science education and classroom teachers partnered with physical education teachers to design integrated units to focus student attention and interest on the physical education topic. This integrated approach assisted students to understand that science is not just learned in the classroom --- but part of many enjoyable and interesting experiences in physical education and at home.
*◊Ennis, C.D. (2007). Charles H. McCloy Lecture: Curriculum research to increase student learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78,138-150.
+Chen, A., Martin, R., Sun, H., & Ennis, C. D. (2007). Is physical activity at risk in constructivist physical education? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport.78, 500-509.
+Ennis, C.D. (2008). Examining curricular coherence in an award-winning elementary school program. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79, 71-84.
+Sun, H., Chen, A., Ennis, C.D., Martin, R. & Shen, B. (2008). An examination of the multidimensionality of situational interest in elementary school physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79, 62-70.
+Chen, A., Martin, R., Ennis, C. D., & Sun, H. (in press). Content specificity of expectancy beliefs and task values in elementary physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport.