Final Remarks and Open Problems



next up previous contents
Next: References Up: Average-Case Intractable NP Problems Previous: Distributional Matrix Transformation

Final Remarks and Open Problems

 

Venkatesan and Rajagopalan [VR92] showed that the distributional matrix representability problem is complete for DistNP by reducing the distributional Post correspondence problem to it under a randomized reduction.gif They also attempted to show that the bounded version of Diophantine problem is average-case NP-complete. Their approach, however, depends on a number theoretic conjecture that remains unproven. The unbounded version of the Diophantine problem is essentially Hilbert's tenth problem, which was shown to be undecidable by Matijasevic [Mat70] based on the work of Davis, Putnam, and Robinson [DPR61]. (A simplified proof of this result can be found from [JM91]). The bounded version of the Diophantine problem has been studied by Adleman and Manders [AM76] [AM75] [MA78].
DISTRIBUTIONAL DIOPHANTINE PROBLEMS

Instance. A positive integers , , and an integer polynomial of degree with variables, where is a free term.

Question. Do there exist non-negative integers such that for , and ?

Distribution. First randomly choose polynomial and then randomly and independently choose with respect to the default random distributions. The polynomial may be chosen with any samplable distribution in which every polynomial has a non-zero probability.
Showing that the distributional Diophantine problem is average-case NP-complete is a challenging task, which may require a deeper understanding of number theory.

We can see that almost all the average-case NP-complete problems known so far are bounded versions of some classical undecidable problems except for the distributional graph edge coloring problem and the distributional matrix transformation problem. The task of bounding a witness size to put a problem in NP is not always trivial. A well-known example is the proof of [Pra75]. It is interesting to note that the use of randomized reductions has opened a door for us to find average-case NP-complete problems that do not belong to such kind of bounded problems.

It is an important and challenging task to systematically investigate the average-case complexity of the NP-complete problems listed in [Kar72], and in [GJ79] at large. Some of these problems have been shown easy on average, but many of them remain unknown. Reductions will certainly play an important role in this investigation. In particular, randomized reductions will be a powerful tool to show that a distributional problem is average-case NP-complete since flat distributions come quite naturally to many of these problems.

Acknowledgment. I am grateful to Jay Belanger and Yuri Gurevich for reading an early version of this paper and I thank them for their helpful comments.



next up previous contents
Next: References Up: Average-Case Intractable NP Problems Previous: Distributional Matrix Transformation



Jie Wang
Mon Feb 3 15:13:50 EST 1997