Once you have learned to recognize a variety of valid and invalid forms of conditional argument, you can evaluate many unfamiliar forms of argument by recasting them as equivalent conditional arguments. Any disjunction is equivalent to a conditional, and so is any negated conjunction. Any conditional is equivalent to another conditional (its contrapositive). Thus, whenever we find conditionals and/or disjunctions and/or negated conjunctions in an argument, we can substitute equivalent conditionals for them and check for familar valid and invalid conditional argument forms. For instance, the confusing argument "Not both P and not Q; either not Q or R; therefore if not R, then not P" is equivalent to an argument that is very familiar and not at all confusing. Read on...
If you negate both components of a conditional, and switch them around, the resulting conditional (called the contrapositive) is equivalent to the original conditional.
If R then S = if not S then not R Example. If it rained, it's steamy = if it's not steamy, it didn't rain
When you negate an already negative component, the double negation should be cancelled.
If R then not S = if not not S then not R = if S then not R
If not R then S = if not S then not not R = if not S then R
If not R then not S = if not not S then not not R = if S then R
Contraposition involves two operations: we negate both components and switch them around. Neither operation by itself gives an equivalent conditional.
If P then Q ≠ If Q then P
If P then Q ≠ If not P then not Q
Contraposition changes the form of a conditional argument but does not alter its validity.
| Before: valid | After: valid |
| If P then Q | If not Q then not P |
| P | P |
| ----- | ----- |
| Q | Q |
| Before: invalid | After: invalid |
| If P then Q | If not Q then not P |
| Q | Q |
| ----- | ----- |
| P | P |
| Before: valid | After: valid |
| If P then Q | If not Q then not P |
| If Q then R | If Q then R |
| ----- | ----- |
| If P then R | If P then R |
| Before: invalid | After: invalid |
| If P then R | If not R then not P |
| If Q then R | If Q then R |
| ----- | ----- |
| If P then Q | If P then Q |
You can construct a conditional equivalent to a disjunction. Take either disjunct as the consequent, and the negation of the other disjunct as the antecedent.
Either R or S = if not R then S = if not S then R
Example. Either Rog or Sal will help = If Rog won’t help, Sal will = If Sal won’t help, Rog will
When you negate an already negative component, the double negation should be cancelled.
Either not R or S = if R then S = if not S then not R
Either R or not S = if not R then not S = if S then R
Either not R or not S = if R then not S = if S then not R
You can construct a conditional equivalent to a negated conjunction (a "not both" type compound). Take either conjunct as antecedent, and the negation of the other conjunct as consequent.
Not both R and S = if R then not S = if S then not R
Example. Rog and Sal won’t both help = If Rog helps, Sal won’t = If Sal helps, Rog won’t
When you negate an already negative component, the double negation should be cancelled.
Not both R and not S = if R then S = if not S then not R
Not both not R and S = if not R then not S = if S then R
Not both not R and not S = if not R then S = if not S then R
| Original argument | Transformed argument |
| Not both P and not Q | If P then Q |
| Either not Q or R | If Q then R |
| ∴ If not R then not P | ∴ If P then R |
| Original argument | Transformed argument |
| Either P or not Q | If Q then P |
| If not R then not Q | If Q then R |
| ∴ Not both P and not R | ∴ If P then R |