| |
Kings of France
447 AD - 1945
When
you see a crown, click it to see a portrait of the ruler. |
After
the collapse of the Western Empire, and the occupation of much of Gaul
by the Franks, Roman power never returned far enough to come into
conflict with the Frankish kingdom. Instead, as the advent of Islâm
permanently ended the possibility of further Roman revival, the Franks
soon became the predominant power in Western Europe. By 774, the Franks
were virtually the only organized Christian kingdom between Islâm
in Spain, the pagan powers to the east, and the remaining Roman Empire,
now Greek in character, to the southeast. Indeed, to many the Franks became
Western Europe: The words for "European" in Arabic, ifranji,
and Persian, farangi, preserve the term. "Frankish" (Latin "Franciscus,"
masculine, and "Francisca," feminine) also occurs as a very common given
name in Western European lanuages, from "Francesco/Francesca" in Italian,
to "François/Françoise" in French, to "Francis(Frank)/Frances"
in English, etc. Here, therefore, "Francia" will mean all of Europe that
in the Mediaeval period was subject to the Roman Catholic Church,
with its Latin liturgy, headed by the Pope, the Bishop
of Rome. Indeed, for many centuries, Latin was the only written language
over an area, "greater" Francia, that came to stretch from Norway to Portugal
and from Iceland to Catholic parts of the Ukraine. A Swede like Karl von
Linné would be known by a Latinized name as Carolus Linnaeus,
a Pole like Mikolaj Kopernik as Nicholaus Copernicus, and an Italian
like Christoforo Columbo (Cristóbal Colón in Spanish) as
Christophorus(-er) Columbus.
The original core of Francia, the Frankish Kingdom that came to dominate
the West under Charlemagne, can be identified as those areas upon whose
ruler the Pope at one time
or another conferred a crown as the Roman Emperor. Part of the Mediaeval
theory of Papal power came to include this ultimate authority to create
and legitimate secular authority. Outlying areas, Spain, Britain, Scandinavia,
etc.,
are
considered separately as the
Periphery
of Francia. Charlemagne himself ruled modern France, northern Italy,
and most of modern Germany. After the death of Charles the Fat in 888,
the imperial title was fitfully conferred on Kings
of Italy, and then lapsed entirely in 922. The descent of King Otto
I of Germany into Italy ushered in new combinations of territory and
a new line of Emperors, as the Pope crowned Otto in 962. The "Empire" came
to be regarded as consisting of four crowns: (1) East Francia, or
Germany, (2) Lombardy (the "Iron Crown"), or Italy, (3) Rome, and, after
1032, (4) Burgundy. Lorraine, which had been a separate kingdom in the
inheritance of Charlemagne, soon become part of the system of "Stem Duchies"
in Germany. Most of the Stem Duchies, like Saxony, Franconia, and Bavaria,
corresponded to preexisting German tribes. The title dux ("leader"),
which was the Roman title of a frontier military commander, thus achieves
its elevated Mediaeval meaning in relation to these units.
A
duke is only inferior to a sovereign prince. The next highest title, marquis
or margrave (Markgraf), signified the count (comes, Graf,
or "earl" in English) of a march (Mark) territory. The marches were
border territories that involved a great deal of fighting. In Charlemagne's
day, that included marches in Spain contesting the Islâmic advance.
Later, the German marches north and south of Bohemia extended German settlement
far to the east. Brandenburg became the most famous northern march,
remaining a margravate until becoming the Kingdom of Prussia.
Austria (Österreich, the "eastern realm") was the most
famous southern march, becoming a duchy, then the only "archduchy," and
finally an empire.
As the authority of the German Emperors declined, and that of the Kings
of France grew, the "Middle Kingdom" (Francia Media) of Lorraine, Burgundy,
and Italy began to pass either from German to French control (Upper Lorraine,
Burgundy) or from German control to separate status (Lower Lorraine, i.e.
the Netherlands and Belgium, and Italy). This process continued well into
the modern period, when we see a multiplication of kingdoms, reaching five
in Germany (not counting Bohemia) and two in Lower Lorraine.
The
Dukes of Savoy, beginning with a county in Burgundy,
acquired more land and a capital (Turin) in Italy, named their new Kingdom
after Sardinia
and ultimately succeeded as the modern Kings of Italy.
After Mussolini conquered Ethiopia in 1936, one King of Italy was briefly,
and fatally, associated with this as the Emperor of Ethiopia.
Without otherwise going outside of Francia, we certainly see enough emperors.
The Holy Roman Emperors, especially after the title became nearly hereditary
with the Hapsburgs, became less and less concerned with confirming their
crown with the Pope. The last time the Pope was called upon to crown an
Emperor was when Napoleon decided to reclaim the title for the Western
Franks, the French (and himself), in 1804. Napoleon knew better,
however, than to allow that the Pope really had the kind of authority that
the coronation of Charlemagne implied: Napoleon took the crown from
the Pope's hands and crowned himself. The Hapsburgs were not going to be
left behind by this: They elevated Austria to the status of
Empire without any help from the Pope. Napoleon then abolished the Holy
Roman Empire, leaving a French and an Austrian Emperor in Francia. After
Napoleon's fall, the French title was later revived by Napoleon III, but
then in the aftermath of the Franco-Prussian War and his fall, Otto
von Bismark decided to transfer the dignity to a newly reunited Germany,
with the King of Prussia as a new, entirely German and not even Catholic,
German Emperor, ruling over Prussia and the three other remaining kingdoms
(Saxony, Bavaria, and Württemberg -- Hanover had been absorbed into
Prussia). Except for the brief episode with Mussolini, emperors vanished
from Francia, and from Russia,
in the Götterdämmerung of World War I. This did not mean,
unfortunately, the immediate triumph of democracy and liberty. Instead,
the conservative oppression of regimes like Austria, which were said to
be "despotism tempered by inefficiency," was followed by the far more oppressive,
sinister, and murderous "evil empires" of Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia,
both founded on 20th century totalitarian, collectivist ideology -- though
Hitler did like to think of his regime as a "Third Reich" continuing the
German empires of the past. Lenin and Stalin had no use for such historical
romance, though their power would have been the envy of any Tsar and did
continue police state devices begun by the Tsars. It is post-Communist
Russia, struggling with corrupt democracy and a collapsing economy, that
now may be the most susceptible to Fascist romances about the Tsars.
The Merovingian Franks, 447-751
| FRANKS, MEROVINGIAN KINGS |
| Merovech (Meerwig) |
447-458 |
| Childerich
I |
458-481 |
| Clovis I
(Chlodwig) |
481-511 |
| Chlodomer |
511-524 |
| Childebert
I |
511-558 |
| Theuderich I |
511-524 |
| Theudebert I |
534-548 |
| Theudebald |
548-555 |
| Chlothar I |
511-560 |
| Charibert I |
561-567 |
| Gunthchramn |
561-593 |
| Sigibert I |
561-575 |
| Childebert
II |
575-595 |
| Theudebert II |
595-612 |
| Theuderich II |
595-613 |
| Sigibert II |
613 |
| Chilperich
I |
561-584 |
| Chlothar II |
584-629 |
| Dagobert I |
623-638 |
| Charibert II |
629-632 |
| Sigibert III |
634-656 |
| Dagobert II |
656 |
| Childebert Adoptivus |
656-661, Carolingian |
| Clovis II |
638-657 |
| Childerich II |
662-675 |
| Chlothar III |
657-673 |
| Clovis III |
675-676 |
| Theuderich III |
673-691 |
| Clovis IV |
691-695 |
| Childebert III |
695-711 |
| Dagobert III |
711-715 |
| Chilperich II |
715-721 |
| Chlothar (Lothair) IV |
717-720 |
| Theuderich IV |
721-737 |
| interregnum, Carolingian mayors rule |
| Childerich III |
743-751 |
|
The foundation of Frankish power was laid by Clovis, who not only occupied
northern Gaul (486), absorbed the Alemanni (505), and defeated the Visigoths
(507), but actually converted to orthodox Catholicism, making the Franks
the first major German tribe to accept the spiritual authority of the Roman
Church and so, as the closest Patriarch, the Pope in Rome itself. This
was later viewed as a portent for Frankish greatness, and it was later
believed that a vial of oil descended from heaven to anoint and sanctify
Clovis as King.
The division of the Kingdom, in time honored fashion, between the four
sons of Clovis, fragemented Frankish power and slowed its growth. After
the conquest of the Thuringians (531), the Burgundians (534), Provence
(536), and the Bavarians (555), there was little growth of the Kingdom
for the remaining period of the Merovingian Dynasty. Power passed to the
Mayors of the Palace. |
The Carolingian Franks,
628-1005
FRANKS,
CAROLINGIAN MAYORS, KINGS, & EMPERORS |
| Pepin I |
Mayor, 628-639 |
| Pepin II |
Mayor, 687-714 |
| Charles Martel |
Mayor, 714-741 |
| Carloman |
Mayor, 741-747 |
| Pepin III the
Short |
Mayor, 747-751;
King, 751-768 |
| Carloman I |
768-771 |
I of France |
Charles I the
Great
 |
King, 768-;
Emperor, 800-814 |
I of France, Germany,
Burgundy, Italy, & Empire |
When the Mayor of the Palace Charles Martel defeated an incursion from
Islamic Spain at Poitiers in 732, it was clear that the Frankish kings
had become weak beyond recall. All that was needed was a source of legitimacy
for a change of dynasty, which in any case was effected in 751. The legitimacy,
as it happened, was conveniently provided by the Pope. Appeals from Pope
Gregory III to Charles Martel himself for help against the Lombards in
739 and 740 had gone unheeded; but when Pope Stephen III travelled to meet
Pepin III in 753-754, he procured Pepin's promise of help and sealed the
pack by formally anointing Pepin King of the Franks. Pepin defeated the
Lombards in 754 and 756 and delivered to the Pope, over the protests of
Roman officials from Constantinople, the "Exarchate of Ravenna" corridor
from Rome to Ravenna. This established the form, or at least claims, of
the Papal States for the next 1100 years.
The
Lombards would not stay defeated, and Pepin's son Charles eventually had
to conquer them and annex their kingdom (774). His conquest of the pagan
Saxons (782-804) and expansion in other directions began to turn the Frankish
Kingdom into a superstate. This began to give Charles and the Pope ideas,
especially when the Empress Irene deposed and blinded her son, Constantine
VI, in 797, assuming sole rule: the first time a woman ruled Romania in
her own name. The Westerners were little disposed to regard a woman as
a legitimate emperor--women could not rule in the law of the Salic Franks
(hence the "Salic Law" against female succession). So, on Christmas Day
in the year 800, the Pope crowned Charles Roman Emperor, taking for himself
a role and an authority that he had never had anything to do with before.
In taking the title from the Pope, Charles (now "the Great," "Carolus Magnus,"
or "Charlemagne") fatefully assumed both pretensions, to Empire, and an
obligation, to Popes, that would prove a source of endless dispute, grief,
and hybris in the future.
The breakup of Charlemagne's kingdom was fateful to the history of Western
Europe for centuries to come. Although soon surrounded by independent Christian
states, in Britain and Ireland to the northwest, Spain in the southwest,
Hungary and Poland in the east, and the Sandinavian states in the north,
the Frankish kingdoms remained the central tentpole of European politics.
As neat halves of Charlemange's empire eventually formed, France in the
West and Germany in the East, the stage for the greatest battles of modern
war in the 19th and 20th centuries would be set along the seam, from Waterloo
(1815) to Verdun (1916) to the Bulge (1944).
| Carolingians |
| Louis I the
Pious |
814-840 |
I of France, Italy,
Germany, Burgundy,
& Empire |
| Pepin |
781-810 |
of Italy |
| Bernard |
810-818 |
of Italy |
| Lothar I |
840-855 |
I of Italy, Burgundy,
Lorraine, & Empire |
| Lothar II |
855-869 |
II of Lorraine |
| Charles of Burgundy |
855-863 |
of Burgundy |
| Louis II |
855-875 |
II of Italy, Burgundy,
& Empire |


Carolingians,
Francia Occidentalis, France |
| Charles
II the Bald |
843-877;
Emperor, 875-877 |
II of France
& Empire |
| Louis II the Stammerer |
877-879 |
II of France |
| Louis III |
879-882 |
III of France |
| Carloman II |
879-884 |
II of France |
| Charles III
the Fat |
Germany, 876-887;
France, 884-888;
Italy, 879-888;
Emperor, 881-888 |
III of Germany
& Empire; no
# of France |
Odo (Eudes),
Count of Paris |
888-898 |
of France |
| Charles III
the Simple |
898-922 |
III of France |
Robert I,
Count of Paris |
922-923 |
I of France |
Rudolf/Raoul,
Duke of Burgundy |
923-936 |
of France |
| Louis IV d'Outremer |
936-954 |
IV of France |
| Lothair V |
954-986 |
V of France |
| Louis V |
986-987 |
V of France |
Carolingians,
Francia Orientalis, Germany |
| Louis II the
German |
843-876 |
II of Germany |
| Carloman of
Bavaria |
Germany, 876-880;
Italy, 877-879 |
of Germany
& Italy |
| Louis III |
876-882 |
III of Germany |
| Charles III
the Fat |
Germany, 876-887;
France, 884-888;
Italy, 879-888;
Emperor, 881-888 |
III of Germany
& Empire |
| Arnulf of Carinthia |
887-899;
Emperor, 896-899 |
of Germany,
Italy, & Empire |
| Louis IV the
Child |
899-911 |
IV of Germany |

Carolingians,
Francia Media, Lorraine |
| Zwentibold of Lorraine |
895-900 |
King of Lorraine |
|
| Charles of Lorraine |
975-991 |
Duke of Lower Lorraine |
|
| Otto of Lorraine |
991-1005 |
Duke of Lower Lorraine |
the Last Carolingian |
FRANCIA AFTER THE CAROLINGIANS
FRANCIA OCCIDENTALIS, FRANCE
| BOURBON KINGS |
| Henry IV of
Bourbon |
1589-1610 |
| Louis XIII |
1610-1643 |
| Thirty Years War, 1618-1648 |
| Louis XIV |
1643-1715 |
Treaty of Westphalia, 1648;
War of Devolution, 1667-1668;
Dutch War, 1672-1678;
War of the League of Augsburg, 1688-1697;
War of the Spanish Succession, 1701-1713 |
| Louis XV |
1715-1774 |
War of the Polish Succession, 1733-1735;
War of the Austrian Succession, 1740-1748;
Seven Years War, 1756-1763 |
Louis XVI  |
1774-1792 |
French Revolution, 1789;
First Republic, 1792-1804;
First Empire, 1804-1814, 1815 |
| Louis XVIII |
1814-1824 |
| Charles X |
1824-1830 |
Revolution of 1830,
ORLÉANist KING |
| Louis Philippe
of Orléans |
1830-1848 |
Second Republic, 1848-1852;
Second Empire, 1852-1870 |
The French Revolution had two unexpected results, the Reign of Terror
and the dictatorship of Napoleon. Thomas
Jefferson thought that the violence might actually be worth it, if
only one man and woman were left, to get rid of the Old Regime. However,
he then realized that the power of the Terrorists was not, after all, being
used for any worthy end. Napoleon at first "saved the revolution" but then
produced his own version of the Old Regime. In 1803 he began handing out
new Imperial Electorships to his supporters (e.g. Baden,
Württemberg)
in Germany, perhaps looking forward to being elected Holy Roman Emperor.
However, his patience with this didn't last more than a year. He would
have had a long time to wait, since the Emperor Francis II would live until
1835. Instead, with the blessing, but not the authority, of the Pope, he
crowned himself Emperor, as the new Charlemagne, in 1804. He soon abolished
the old Empire (1806), gave his supporters elevated titles (Baden became
a Grand Duchy, Württemberg a Kingdom, etc.), and established other
monarchies, often for his relatives, in the territories brought under the
control of France. The Revolution had already begun to radically transform
the map of Europe, but under Napoleon especially the familiar boundaries
of European states appeared to melt and run with an alarming fluidity and
frequency.
| BONAPARTE EMPERORS |
| First Empire, 1804-1814, 1815 |
Napoleon
I
|
1799-1804, First Consul;
1804-1814, 1815,
last Emperor crowned
by Pope, d. 1821 |
Second Republic, 1848-1852;
Second Empire, 1852-1870 |
| Napoleon III |
1852-1870, last French
Emperor, d. 1873 |
Third Republic, 1871-1940;
Vichy State & German
Occupation, 1940-1944;
Fourth Republic, 1946-1958;
Fifth Republic, 1958- |
French power had shaken Europe under Louis XIV, but Louis himself ran up
against the limits to which French power could be mobilized, and his wars
damaged the basis of that power.
For
the rest of the century, France declined in its ability to focus its resources,
until the Revolution began as the King simply appealed for more taxes.
The Revolution then introduced two specifically modern innovations:
(1) the destruction of all traditional limitations on power; and (2) the
total subordination of all activity to politics and the state. This was
the essence of modern totalitarianism, later theoretically formulated by
Marx, and it enabled France to wash over her enemies -- all except England,
which had had its Revolutions back in the 17th century. Napoleon, although
reconciling with the Pope and supposedly reintroducing some of the limitations
on government of traditional society, even marrying a Hapsburg and producing
a half-Hapsburg heir (Napoleon II), nevertheless was still ruthless beyond
most precedent.
Even Napoleon, however, began to run up against the limits of French power.
The British "nation of shopkeepers" frustrated him at sea and poured arms,
money, and men into Spain to help in the national rising against the French.
Looking for new conquests, Napoleon unfortunately (for him) turned on Russia.
The size of Russia and the punishing winter (or, as it happens, just the
autumn) destroyed Napoleon's Grande Armée. The collapse then
came rapidly enough. Abdicating, Napoleon was unhappy as the Prince of
Elba, tried to return to power, and was defeated at Waterloo after only
100 days. His few remaining days were then spent on distant St. Helena.
The French Second Empire developed when Napoleon's nephew, Louis Napoleon,
transformed himself from the President of the Second Republic to the Emperor
of the Second Empire. Napoleon III's France was a much more conventional,
politic, and durable state than Napoleon I's. Napoleon III ironically obtained
territorial additions to France from his ally, Sardinia, after defeating
their mutual enemy, Austria. He was even an ally of England in the
Crimean War (1853-1856), though there was otherwise a great deal of friction
with France's ancient enemy. In short, the Second Empire was no upheaval
of Europe the way that the First Republic and the First Empire had been.
The end of Napoleon III, however, was the consequence of Otto von Bismark's
plan for the coming German upheaval. Defeated by Prussia, Napoleon abdicated
and left France to its fate, but at least his last years of exile, in England
itself, were rather more comfortable and honorable than Napoleon I's had
been.
FRANCIA MEDIA, BURGUNDY
| Kings of Burgundy |
| Boso |
of Lower
Burgundy/
Provence,
879-887 |
| Louis III |
of Lower
Burgundy/
Provence,
887-928;
Emperor
901-905 |
| Hugh of Arles |
of Lower
Burgundy,
928-933;
of Italy
926-947 |
| Rudolf I |
of Upper
Burgundy,
888-912 |
| Rudolf II |
912-937
of Upper
Burgundy;
of Italy
922-926;
of Lower
Burgundy,
933-937 |
Conrad the
Peaceful |
937-993 |
| Rudolf III |
993-1032 |
Burgundy Inherited by
Conrad II the Salian |
| Counts
of Savoy |
Humbert I
White Hands |
c. 1000 |
| Amadeus I |
c. 1048 |
| Odo |
c. 1057 |
| Peter I |
d. 1078 |
| Amadeus II |
1078-1080 |
| Humbert II |
1080-1103 |
| Amadeus III |
c. 1103-1149 |
Humbert III
the Saint |
1149-1189 |
| Thomas I |
1189-1233 |
| Amadeus IV |
1233-1253 |
| Boniface |
1258-1263 |
Peter II, "little
Charlemagne" |
1263-1268 |
| Philip I |
1268-1285 |
| Amadeus V |
1285-1323 |
| Edward |
1323-1329 |
| Aimon |
1329-1343 |
Amadeus VI
the Green |
1343-1383 |
Amadeus VII
the Red |
1383-1391 |
| Dukes of Savoy |
Amadeus
VIII
(Anti-Pope
Felix V) |
Count of Savoy,
1391-1416 |
Duke of Savoy,
1416-1434 |
Anti-Pope,
1439-1449 |
| Louis |
1434-1465 |
| Amadeus IX |
1465-1472 |
| Philibert I |
1472-1482 |
| Charles I |
1482-1490 |
| Charles II |
1490-1496 |
| Philip |
1496-1497 |
| Philibert II |
1497-1504 |
| Charles III |
1504-1553 |
| Emanuel Philibert |
1553-1580 |
| Charles Emanuel I |
1580-1630 |
| Victor Amadeus I |
1630-1637 |
| Charles Emanuel II |
1637-1675 |
| Victor
Amadeus II |
Duke of Savoy,
1675-1730 |
King of Sicily,
1713-1720 |
King of Sardinia,
1720-1730 |
Sources
My sources for all these tables are varied and now sometimes hard to
keep track of. Some of the earliest lists were from An Encyclopedia
of World History; Ancient, Medieval, and Modern, Chronologically Arranged,
compiled and edited by William L. Langer [Houghton, Mifflin, Company; the
Riverside Press, Boston, 1940, 1948, 1952, 1960]. This one volume compendium
I borrowed from a high school friend in the Sixties and recently consulted
it again when it turned out that a colleague at Valley
College had a copy. Amazon.com
has now found a used copy for me after some months of searching. The most
comprehensive lists of rulers, however, I have found in print are in Kingdoms
of Europe, by Gene Gurney [Crown Publishers, New York, 1982]. Gurney
has some errors and obscurities, but I have not found any other work that
has put so much together in one volume. Some mistakes and gaps in Gurney
concerning the Counts of Flanders I was able to correct by consulting the
Histoire de Flandre et des Flamands an Moyen Age by Edward Le Glay
[Imprimateurs des Facultés Catholiques de Lille, 1886] and The
Murder of Charles the Good -- Galbert of Bruges, translated & edited
by James Bruce Ross [University of Toronto Press, 1982]. I have come across
something else with a great deal of information, a chart, Kings &
Queen of Europe, compiled by Anne Tauté [University of North
Carolina Press, 1989]. This is not as comprehensive, but also seems to
exhibit more careful scholarship. Some corrections may be made as I examine
it carefully. Among prose histories, one of the most longstanding value
has been a textbook I originally had for a class in Beirut,
Medieval Europe, by Martin Scott [Longmans, Green and Co. Ltd.,
London, 1967]. On the internet, Brian
Tompsett's Royal and Noble genealogy is invaluable, and the lists of
the Dukes of Lorraine and of several other German dynasties have been complied
using little else. The only drawbacks are that (1) Thompsett's lists are,
indeed, genealogical, which means it is sometimes hard to find unrelated
rulers in a succession, and (2) the entries are very summary, without any
explanation of may be happening as, for instance, domains are divided among
multiple heirs.
The maps are those of Tony Belmonte, with some corrections and additions.
I am no longer able to find Tony's historical atlas on the Web, and links
that turn up have gone dead. I hope that it will soon return to the Internet.
Corrections and additions are based on The Penguin Atlas of Medieval
History (Colin McEvedy, 1961), The New Penguin Atlas of Medieval
History (Colin McEvedy, 1992), The Penguin Atlas of Modern History
(to 1815) (Colin McEvedy, 1972), The Penguin Atlas of Recent History
(Europe since 1815) (Colin McEvedy, 1982), The Anchor Atlas of World
History, Volume I (Hermann Kinder, Werner Hilgemann, Ernest A. Menze,
and Harald and Ruth Bukor, 1974), The Anchor Atlas of World History,
Volume II (Hermann Kinder, Werner Hilgemann, Ernest A. Menze, and Harald
and Ruth Bukor, 1978), and various prose histories. My graphics programs
do not seem to be quite as sophisticated as Tony's, so maps I have modified
may not look as professionally done as his originals.
The flags are also based on several sources. Flags Through the Ages
and Across the World, by Whitney Smith [McGraw-Hill, 1975], is a splendid
book, as is The International Flag Book in Color, by Christian Fogd
Pedersen, Wilhelm Petersen, and Lieu.-Commander John Bedells, Hon. F.H.S.,
R.N. [William Morrow & Company, 1971]. These books were originally
recommended to me by Professor Norman Martin, for whom I was a teaching
assistant at the University of
Texas. Besides being a professor of philosophy (logic), computer science,
and electrical engineering, Professor Martin was expertly knowledgeable
about flags and military uniforms. More recent developments are covered
by Flags, The Illustrated Identifier to flags of the world, by Eve
Devereux [Chartwell Books, 1994, 1998]. I have been unable to reproduce
some flags with complete accuracy, given the limitations of my graphics
programs and artistic ability.
This page continues and supplements the material in "Rome
and Romania, 27 BC-1453 AD" and "The
Ottoman Sultâns, 1290-1924 AD".
Copyright (c) 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 Kelley
L. Ross, Ph.D. All Rights Reserved