Recovering New Humor: Negotiations of Class
Karen L. Kilcup
Class difference and class relations have been rich
sources of American humor. Whether we consider the wry advice of Franklin, the
dialect humor of Frances Whitcher’s Widow
Bedott Papers and Twain’s Huck Finn,
or the offbeat parody of the weird rich lawyers on Fox TV’s Ally McBeal, writers have found the
subject of class in a putatively classless society irresistible. Each of the
writers whose neglected works are investigated in this special issue conjugate
class, though in very different ways, as a fundamental part of American
experience.
Although Peter Kratzke’s discussion of Ambrose Bierce does not address
class relations directly, it becomes evident as we read both Kratzke and Bierce
himself how important the subject was to the latter. In repeatedly emphasizing
the “vulgarity” of certain locutions, for example, Bierce carefully measures
off a distance between the educated, well-spoken individual, and his or her
ignorant counterpart. For example, Bierce exposes the difference between the
pseudo-genteel and the authentically genteel in his entry on the word
“gentleman,” which insists that “it is not possible to teach the correct use of
this overworked word. . . . To use the word gentleman correctly, be one.” In a
similar vein, he sniffs that the word “spell” is “not very well-born.” Bierce
emerges from a long line of advice writers in the United States whose goals,
like Eliza Leslie’s in “Incorrect Words” (1835), included both making class
more fluid and congealing the boundaries between classes (see Kasson, Karcher,
Halttunen, Matthews, Schlesinger; Sedgwick, Harland, Sherwood).
As Joyce Warren’s essay on
Fanny Fern indicates, “correct” language also included, for women, language
that was not too plain, “coarse,” or direct. Although Bierce’s agenda in Write it Right may be more ambiguous—it
is difficult to know whether he aims to reinforce class hierarchies or to
enable them to be scaled—Fern’s advice, as Warren indicates, empowered the
disenfranchised in American society, giving voice in particular to the
working-class woman. As Alison Easton’s recent essay on Fern explains, “Fern .
. . knew from personal experience the fragility of . . . middle-class life and understood it as a construction”
(223). Fern regarded most advice writing as “moral molasses,” yet her own
writing performs the kind of selfhood she advocates for American women: an
independent, plainspoken, and socially aware individual. Constructing an
analogy between Fern’s writing and contemporary rap singers, Warren reminds us
that Fern creates her identity via a sharp, satirical voice that is not afraid
to take on the powers-that-be in the public sphere, a voice that resonates in
today’s diverse United States culture.
Jacky O’Connor investigates
the work of Tennessee Williams, which she affirms is too infrequently studied
for its humor. While Warren places Fern within a tradition of American women’s
humor, O’Connor situates Williams in the frameworks of both Southern and urban
intellectual humor. Just as language serves as a class marker for Bierce and
Fern, so too it does for Williams, whose characters in “The Lady of Larkspur
Lotion” ironically perform not so much a clash between the “haves” and the
“have-nots” but a tension between those who have little and those who have
less. As O’Connor observes, “attempting to mask her repulsion with her good
manners, Mrs. Hardwicke-Moore appears hesitant to criticize Mrs. Wire’s rooming
house openly. Perhaps she would have the landlady believe that she is too
well-bred to talk about insects.” Behind the humor of this tension between
landlady and tenant resides the poignant irony of an American dream translated
into the ownership of a fake Brazilian rubber plantation.
In focusing on a story taken
from a working-class periodical of the early twentieth century, Ellen Gruber
Garvey explores how Susan Brown Robbins attempts to negotiate across the class
divide that we see articulated, though very differently, in Bierce, Fern, and
Williams. Like each of the contributors, Garvey seeks to situate her writer
within the social and cultural context of her time; she also offers a glimpse
of a virtually forgotten periodical, Ladies’
World, that in seeking a middle-class readership as well as an audience of
farm women incorporated many of the tensions in turn-of-the-century American
culture. Robbins’s story, Garvey argues, offered a kind of double-voiced
discourse, enabling rural woman to laugh at the folly of their frivolous and
fragile city sisters—whom Fern had also mocked much earlier—while the latter
could smile at the naïve rusticity of rural people. Like Warren and O’Connor,
Garvey suggests the investment (in both senses) of class relations in the body:
Robbins intimates that rural woman benefit financially from neurasthenic city
women seeking “rest cures,” while those urban counterparts acquire health of
mind as well as body. However distanced the two groups may be from each other,
they come together in a shared sisterhood of laughter, as the potential distancing
of the urban outsider’s perspective so common in many regionalist writers’ work
of this period is abolished in favor of a relationship of sympathy that we see
in the work of a writer such as Sarah Orne Jewett (Brodhead, Fetterley and
Pryse).
Recovering the work of
regionalist George Savary Wasson, Cameron Nickels also reminds us that this
relationship between rural and urban people was a necessary, if not symbiotic,
one. Although Wasson was himself an outsider to his adopted state of Maine, he
effectively transforms himself into one of the storytellers in Cap’n Simeon’s
store, as they recount the city-foolishness of the “summer folks,” most
hilariously for me in the discussion of what kind of coffee the Cap’n sells.
Emphasizing Wasson’s painterly skill with description and character, Nickels
conveys both the humor and the seriousness of the writer’s message about
differences of class and location. As in the work of all the writers included
here, Wasson’s stories reveal an acute awareness of language difference as a
marker of class difference—and not, by any means, to the disadvantage of the
rural characters. Just as it does for Fern and Robbins, storytelling becomes a
crucial bridge to understanding—as well as a powerful incentive for laughter
within a diverse American culture.
Works
Cited
Brodhead,
Richard. Cultures of Letters: Scenes of
Reading and Writing in Nineteenth-Century America. Chicago: U of Chicago P,
1993.
Fetterley,
Judith, and Marjorie Pryse. Introduction to American
Women Regionalists, 1850-1910. New York, Norton, 1992. xi-xx.
Easton, Alison
M. J. “My Banker and I Can Afford to Laugh! Class and Gender in Fanny Fern and
Nathaniel Hawthorne.” In Soft Canons:
American Women Writers and Masculine Tradition. Ed. Karen L. Kilcup. Iowa
City: U of Iowa P, 1999. 219-36.
Halttunen,
Karen. Confidence Men and Painted Women:
A Study of Middle-Class Culture in America, 1830-1870. New Haven: Yale UP,
1982.
Harland,
Marion. Eve’s Daughters, or Common Sense
for Maid, Wife, and Mother. New York: Charles Scribner’s, 1881.
Jewett, Sarah
Orne. The Country of the Pointed Firs.
Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, 1896.
Karcher,
Carolyn. The First Woman in the Republic:
A Cultural Biography of Lydia Maria Child. Durham: Duke UP, 1994.
Kasson, John. Rudeness and Civility: Manners in
Nineteenth-Century Urban America. New York: Hill and Wang, 1990.
Kilcup, Karen
L. “’Essays of Invention’: Transformations of Advice in Nineteenth-Century
American Women’s Writing.” In Nineteenth-Century
American Women Writers: A Critical Reader. Malden, Mass. and Oxford:
Blackwell, 1998. 184-205.
Leslie, Eliza.
“Incorrect Words” (1835). Rpt. in Nineteenth-Century
American Women Writers: An Anthology. Ed. Karen L. Kilcup. Cambridge,
Mass.: Blackwell, 1997. 21-24.
Matthews,
Glenna. “Just a Housewife”: The Rise and
Fall of Domesticity in America. New York: Oxford UP, 1987.
Schlesinger,
Arthur M. Learning How to Behave: A
Historical Study of American Etiquette Books. New York: Macmillan, 1946.
Sedgwick,
Catharine Maria. Morals of Manners, or,
Hints for our young people. New York: Wiley and Putnam, 1846.
Sherwood, Mrs.
John. Manners and Social Usages.
1884; rpt. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1887.