Genetic Counseling Program

Untitled Document

Standardization of Nuchal Translucency Assessments: Cutoffs, Recommendations and Counseling Approaches.  By Amy Kendall

Capstone Project Committee: Randi Culp Stewart, MS, CGC (UNCG), Co-Chair; Christy Stanley, MS, CGC (Wake Forest Baptist Health), Co-Chair; Martha Decker, MD, MFM (Wake Forest Baptist Health); Sat Gupta, PhD (UNCG) and Scott Richter, PhD (UNCG), Statistical Consultants

Background: The National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) does not have established guidelines regarding counseling for abnormal nuchal translucency (NT) measurements.  The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology recommends using a NT cutoff of 3.5 mm. In the literature, there is a lack of consensus regarding the NT cutoff that should be used to confer a high risk for fetal aneuploidy, which may lead to variability regarding interpretation, counseling and follow up care. Purpose: The goal of this study was to assess the NT cutoffs, recommendations for follow up testing and counseling approaches utilized in assessments performed by prenatal genetic counselors and providers within their clinics. Methods: Prenatal counselors with NSGC membership were surveyed utilizing the NSGC email listserv. Survey data was analyzed for frequency and comparative statistical methods were used. Thematic analysis was performed on qualitative data. Results: 115 participants completed the survey. NT cutoffs used in respondents’ clinics were variable; 3.5 mm (48.7%), 3.0 mm (20%) and ≥ 95% (20%) were most commonly reported. 41.7% of respondents were unaware of what resource(s) their clinic uses to justify their NT cutoff(s). Follow up options of Amniocentesis, Fetal echocardiogram, Target ultrasound, and CVS were the most common follow up options offered although the NT cutoff at which they are offered varied. Drawings/illustrations were used by 62 participants (53.9%) when counseling patients and 56.5% felt that adequate counseling aids are available. 83.5% of respondents thought standardized guidelines would be beneficial and improve patient care. Conclusion: This data did not produce statistical significance to correlate cutoff(s) and follow up testing.  However, the variance of the data demonstrates a wide range of interpretation of an abnormal NT. This variability may present challenges in counseling and patient comprehension and may impact patient care. Data from this study may be used to promote further studies and direct the development of specific guidelines.

Back to Class of 2013 Capstone Projects

 

 
  • About Us
  • Admission Requirements
  • Curriculum
  • Clinical Rotations
  • Resources
  • Make a Gift


  • "I chose to attend UNCG because of its shared learning environment and the access to some of the leading institutions in the country. "



  • "UNCG is a great fit for me. The program directors have extensive experience in the world of genetic counseling and provide you with opportunities to work with some of the best medical centers in the country. Our location allows us to have expert guest lecturers, many of whom you also get to work alongside or observe in your clinical rotations in your second year. We also have some really wonderful and unique opportunities as a part of this program: we observe in syndrome specific support groups and clinics, tour genetic laboratories, and are matched with a family with a genetic disease to learn what it is like to live with a genetic condition. Finally, our directors are genuinely invested in each of us, and care about our success and getting to know each of us personally."




  • "The director and assistant director do their best to ensure that our program provides a collaborative learning experience.  Both are active members of the Genetic Counseling community and strive to introduce you to all aspects of this field.  We also have renowned clinical sites and the beautiful state of North Carolina at our disposal.”